Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.
Matthew 16:24 (NIV)
The Good News, for You. Every Day.
EU•AN•GE•LION (YOO-AN-GEL-EE-ON) · εὐαγγέλιον — Good News
The Good News, for You. Every Day.
EU•AN•GE•LION (YOO-AN-GEL-EE-ON) · εὐαγγέλιον — Good News

Matthew 16:24
DAY 1 OF 6
Jesus’s radical call to discipleship and its immediate context

What Is Carrying a Cross? · 6 Days
Matthew 16:24
Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.
Matthew 16:24 (NIV)

“Sym Cross Burgundy Linocut” — Generated, 2026
GREEK
ἀκολουθέω
/Akoloutheo/(ah-ko-loo-THEH-oh)
To follow
This isn’t casual accompaniment but deliberate, committed following – like a student following a master or a soldier following a commander.
“Jesus isn’t just talking about literal martyrdom. The cross represents the principle of self-denial, of choosing God’s will over our own preferences, of being willing to sacrifice immediate comfort and advantage for the sake of something greater.
This passage occurs at a crucial turning point in Matthew’s Gospel. Jesus has just received Peter’s confession that he is ‘the Messiah, the Son of the living God’ (16:16). But immediately after this high point, Jesus begins to explain that his messiahship will involve suffering and death. When Peter objects to this plan, Jesus delivers some of his harshest words to any of his disciples, calling Peter ‘Satan’ and accusing him of thinking like a human rather than like God.
It’s in this context that Jesus makes his call to discipleship. He’s not offering an easy path to personal fulfillment or worldly success. He’s calling people to follow him on a path that leads through suffering to resurrection, through death to life.
For first-century readers, the image of ‘taking up your cross’ would have been vivid and terrifying. Crucifixion was the Roman method of execution for rebels and criminals – a slow, public, humiliating death designed to deter others from challenging Roman authority. When Jesus spoke of taking up a cross, his audience would have understood this as a call to be willing to die for your convictions.
The Modern Doctor's Dilemma
Dr. Michael Rodriguez had everything he had worked for since medical school. At 38, he was the youngest department head in the history of Metropolitan Hospital, earning a salary that allowed him and his wife Carmen to live in a beautiful home in the suburbs and send their two children to private schools. His research on cardiac surgery techniques was gaining national attention, and he had just been offered a position at Johns Hopkins that would essentially guarantee his career trajectory toward becoming one of the country’s leading heart surgeons.
But Michael couldn’t stop thinking about the conversation he’d had with Dr. Sarah Kim, a colleague who had recently returned from a medical mission trip to Guatemala. She had shown him photos of the rural clinic where she had worked – a facility with basic equipment serving thousands of people who had no access to cardiac care. ‘Michael, I saw conditions there that we could fix with procedures that are routine for us,’ she had said. ‘But there’s no one with your expertise willing to work in those conditions.’
The offer Sarah was making was the opposite of everything Michael had been working toward. Instead of prestige and financial security, she was asking him to consider spending two years in a rural clinic, living in basic conditions, working with limited resources, and earning a fraction of his current salary. It would mean delaying his research, potentially damaging his career prospects, and asking his family to sacrifice the comfortable life they had built.
As Michael sat in his office looking at the Johns Hopkins contract on his desk, he realized he was facing a choice between two completely different definitions of success. One path led toward everything he had always thought he wanted; the other led toward something he had never seriously considered but couldn’t shake from his mind.
Sometimes the most important choices in life aren’t between good and evil, but between different definitions of what makes life worth living.
Who Is Matthew?
Before we examine Matthew’s account of Jesus’s call to discipleship, we should understand who is telling this story and why his perspective matters. Matthew (also called Levi) was a tax collector before becoming one of Jesus’s twelve apostles. This background is crucial for understanding his Gospel. Tax collectors in first-century Palestine were among the most despised people in Jewish society. They worked for the Roman occupying forces, collecting taxes from their own people and often enriching themselves through corruption and extortion. They were considered traitors to their nation and their faith. For Matthew, following Jesus meant literally walking away from a lucrative career and accepting social ostracism from both his former colleagues and his fellow Jews. Matthew’s Gospel was likely written between 70-85 AD, primarily for a Jewish-Christian audience. His frequent quotations from the Hebrew Scriptures and his emphasis on Jesus as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy suggest he was writing to people who needed to understand how Jesus fit into the story of Israel.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Matthew’s personal experience of costly discipleship – leaving everything to follow Jesus – gives particular weight to his recording of Jesus’s teachings about the cost of following him. He knew firsthand what it meant to ‘take up your cross.’
“From a historical credibility standpoint, Matthew’s Gospel contains numerous details about Jewish customs, Palestinian geography, and first-century culture that have been confirmed by archaeological research.
BRIDGE TO CHRIST
ANCIENT TRUTH
Jesus’s call to ‘take up your cross’ connects to a broader biblical theme about the relationship between sacrifice and blessing, death and life. Throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, God’s people are called to choose between immediate comfort and long-term faithfulness.
“Abraham was called to leave his homeland and family for an unknown destination (Genesis 12:1). Moses gave up his position in Pharaoh’s household to identify with the enslaved Israelites (Hebrews 11:24-26). The prophet Jeremiah was called to deliver messages that would make him unpopular and endangered (Jeremiah 1:17-19). In each case, faithfulness to God required sacrificing immediate advantages for the sake of a greater purpose.
MODERN APPLICATION
This isn’t the gentle, comforting Jesus of popular imagination – this is Jesus making demands that seem to go against every human instinct for self-preservation and personal happiness.
NEW TESTAMENT ECHO
The pattern throughout Scripture is that God’s call often involves leaving behind what seems secure and comfortable in order to participate in something larger and more meaningful than personal success or happiness.

“Sym Cross Simple Linocut” — Generated, 2026
HONEST-EXAMINATION
What does it mean to voluntarily choose a path that involves denial and sacrifice rather than pursuing personal comfort and success?
PRAYER
(personal)Posture: petition
Help me to understand what Jesus is really asking of those who would follow him, and give me the courage to honestly consider the cost.
TAKEAWAY
Before you go to bed tonight, identify one area where you’re currently choosing comfort over calling. Write it down. Tomorrow, take one small step toward the harder but more meaningful path.
LEAVING AT THE CROSS
RECEIVING FROM THE CROSS
The Tax Collector Turned Apostle
Matthew was a tax collector before becoming one of Jesus’s twelve apostles. Tax collectors in first-century Palestine were among the most despised people in Jewish society – considered traitors who worked for the Roman occupying forces. For Matthew, following Jesus meant literally walking away from a lucrative career and accepting social ostracism.
“His personal experience of costly discipleship gives particular weight to his recording of Jesus’s teachings about the cost of following him.
LESSON FOR US
If Matthew could leave behind financial security and social standing to follow Jesus, we must honestly ask what we are willing to sacrifice for our faith.
The Disciple Who Resisted the Cross
Peter represents the natural human response to Jesus’s message about suffering. He wanted the benefits of following the Messiah without the cost. His rebuke of Jesus reveals how deeply our human instincts resist the idea that the path to life leads through death.
“Never, Lord! This shall never happen to you!
LESSON FOR US
Jesus called Peter ‘Satan’ and ‘a stumbling block’ for thinking with human concerns rather than God’s concerns. This challenges us to examine our own resistance to costly discipleship.
Finished reading? Mark this day read.